
Welcome to The Rejection Quarterly, Summer 2019 edition.
Sharing rejections shares the effort behind submissions and makes celebrating acceptances even sweeter. What kind of literary journal rejections are you seeing? On the road to publication, why not “publish” the rejections themselves?
Here are the various rejections I collected from June 2019 – August 2019. The list is shorter than my usual, which says more about how active I was in Winter and Spring. Summer does tend to be a time of fewer responses as many university-affiliated journals take a break.
Rejection from American Short Fiction
398-day response time
Dear Arthur Klepchukov,
Thank you for submitting “furl & unfurl” to American Short Fiction. First off, we want to apologize to you for the lateness of this response. While in the end this particular story is not quite the right fit for us, it took us too long to pass it through the various levels of editorial consideration. We are a small operation and respect writer’s work, so we always give each story the time it deserves. With this in mind, we have closed our submissions in order to catch up. Please accept our apologies and know we are working diligently to respond to submissions more rapidly in the future.
Best wishes,
The Editors, American Short Fiction
Encouraging Rejection from Palooka
30-day response time
Dear Arthur,
Thanks for giving me the chance to read your fine work yet again. “The Price of Chivalry” has a strong voice, interesting narrative style, and is funny along the way, though I’m sorry to say we won’t be publishing the work. I realize how much time, effort, passion, and energy goes into this endeavor and appreciate your interest in Palooka.
All best,
Jonathan Starke, Editor
http://palookamag.com/submit
Encouraging Rejection from Typishly
1-day response time (yes, Jon is that fast)
Hello Arthur.
Good to reconnect with you. Thank you for sending your story to us. Regretfully, we won’t be able to publish your work this time. As you know, only a fraction of the short fiction we receive is selected, so even strong writing must sometimes be left out.
We’re grateful you chose to share your creativity with Typishly again. Lovely: ‘seconds that’ll multiply after first blush until anniversaries arrive.’ Wonderful: ‘hopes still divide like nuclei.’
Be well. Be creative.
Jon
Founding Editor | Typishly
Rejection from Barrelhouse
15-day response time
Dear Arthur,
Thanks for letting us read The Price of Chivalry. Unfortunately, we’ve decided this one’s not right for us. We wish you the best of luck in finding a home for the story elsewhere, and in your continued writing.
Sincerely,
Team Barrelhouse
www.barrelhousemag.com
Rejection from SmokeLong Quarterly
10-day response time
Dear Arthur,
Thank you for your submission of “The Price of Chivalry” to SmokeLong Quarterly. We gave the story careful consideration, and though we are not accepting it for publication, we hope you find a better fit for it elsewhere.
Thanks again for trusting us with your work, and thank you for reading SmokeLong Quarterly.
All the best,
Editors
SmokeLong Quarterly
http://smokelong.com
Encouraging Rejection from Fantasy & Science Fiction (F&SF)
2-day response time
Dear Arthur,
Thank you for giving me a chance to read “Duskwing.” I liked the quality of the prose, but overall this piece didn’t win me over for Fantasy & Science Fiction and I’m going to pass. I wish you best of luck finding the right market for it and hope that you’ll keep us in mind in the future.
Best regards,
Charlie
—
C.C. Finlay, Editor
Fantasy & Science Fiction
fandsf.com | @fandsf
Thank you to everyone who recently subscribed to F&SF or renewed your subscription — with your help, we’ve been able to raise our minimum pay rates for authors to 8 cents per word.
Rejection from Glowworm
38-day response time
Dear Arthur Klepchukov,
Thank you for your submission to Glowworm. Although we must decline your submission this time, we appreciated the chance to consider it.
Thanks again. Best of luck with this.
Sincerely,
Christian Brady
Glowworm
Rejection from The Cincinnati Review
175-day response time
Dear Writer:
Thank you for the opportunity to consider your submission “Nevernight.” We’ve read it with care but have decided not to accept it for publication. Best of luck placing it elsewhere.
Sincerely,
The Editors of The Cincinnati Review
Rejection from The New Yorker
106-day response time
Dear Arthur,
We regret that we are unable to use the enclosed material. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors
I was flattered with even a form rejection given the volume of submissions The New Yorker must receive. My last submission didn’t get a response. Their submission guidelines say to consider a piece rejected if you don’t hear back in 90 days.
Encouraging Rejection from Abyss & Apex
24-day response time
Dear Arthur,
Thank you for submitting “Duskwing” to ABYSS & APEX. I enjoyed your story. It had some great imagery and prose poetry feel that I liked. Unfortunately, we won’t be accepting this for publication.
Thanks for sending us your work. We hope you’ll consider us again and wish you the best in placing this story elsewhere.
Sincerely,
Derek Wentz
Assistant Fiction Editor
Not enough rejection? See Rejection Wiki or Literistic’s Great Wall of Literary Rejection.
Understand your rejections
Copy & paste your rejection; get a concise interpretation.
Hi Arthur, Gosh, reading these rejections is just painful. I’m enjoying your blog posts and learning about your journey as a writer.
Thanks for the kind words Marylee. Rejections are a part of the journey. Most of the sting faded very quickly after I got used to the submitting cycle.
Arthur, thank you for sharing these rejection letters. Which ones do you find more troubling? The encouraging ones or the plain rejections? I do play Rejection Bingo though. Lol. I have a growing list called “The Folder of Misfit Stories” that have been rejected. And rejected. Poor homeless little things.
Hi Monique. I don’t find either kind of rejection particularly troubling. At worst, it’s the notion that someone beyond my circle has read my work even if only its brief beginning. The encouraging ones usually make me submit something else to the same market. The form ones I’ve learned to shrug off. I have several stories that have been rejected over two dozen times. I’m often humbled by how many drafts and revisions some things take. How do you take rejections? What do you mean by Rejection Bingo?
Hello again Arthur. Yes, the amount of time we dedicate to revising our manuscripts is indeed humbling. I sometimes see the encouraging rejections as lodestones pointing me in a more promising direction. They reveal what didn’t work and what I can do to polish my work. Here’s some information on Rejection Bingo — tee hee — https://adaratrosclair.wordpress.com/2018/02/08/anyone-for-a-game-of-rejection-bingo/ I hope it will be a smile on your face. :)
Oops. I meant to write “put a smile on your face”. This wandering mind of mine! Lol!
Good for you for putting your work out there. That takes a lot of guts.
Thanks Tina. Happy submitting!
Congratulations on your rejections! (It comes off sounding less congratulatory than intended, given the subject matter). Keep trying, though. I feel you’re onto something.
Hi, thanks for posting these! Several editors remember you/know who you are. That’s awesome. I was wondering if this was just due to them remembering your work. Or if it was something you mentioned in your cover letter. Or something else. I’ve never experienced that so I was just curious.
Hey Ian, I just took that as a kind thought included since I’d submitted before. I’m not sure if it speaks to anything more, but I do tend to resubmit to places I really like or those that previously sent encouraging rejections. Hope that helps! Happy submitting!